thoughts on Shogun
Jan. 8th, 2008 01:38 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
There's a scene in Part 2 of Shogun where the main lady offers Blackthorne sexual access to the three servants who attend him, or, if he would prefer, a boy, and it occured to me that this scene was totally plagiarized from The Man Who Would be King. Now, I haven't read either source novel, so I can't say for certain that James Clavell was intentionally ripping off Rudyard Kipling, but the screenwriter sure as hell was. It made me kind of mad on behalf of that Harvard student who lost her book deal a few years ago for a similar transgression.
Also, considering Richard Chamberlain was all closeted back then, I wonder what it was like for him to act all offended and disgusted about it, when in reality it was that same general offense and disgust that was making his life miserable. It must have chafed to have to play that scene straight (as it were). Like Buddy Cole says, "I'm not saying Richard Chamberlain is gay; I just hope he has a good lover. Because he's going to need a lot of sex with a man to get him through this!"
Also, saints preserve us from portrayals of infantilized Japanese women shuffling around in their little sandals and giggling behind their fingers! Aren't there SAG bylaws about that sort of thing?
Also, considering Richard Chamberlain was all closeted back then, I wonder what it was like for him to act all offended and disgusted about it, when in reality it was that same general offense and disgust that was making his life miserable. It must have chafed to have to play that scene straight (as it were). Like Buddy Cole says, "I'm not saying Richard Chamberlain is gay; I just hope he has a good lover. Because he's going to need a lot of sex with a man to get him through this!"
Also, saints preserve us from portrayals of infantilized Japanese women shuffling around in their little sandals and giggling behind their fingers! Aren't there SAG bylaws about that sort of thing?
no subject
Date: 2008-01-08 07:18 pm (UTC)I don't really see the problem with this, but the people who say it seem to think that's bad.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-08 07:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-08 07:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-08 09:03 pm (UTC)The book's here:
http://tinyurl.com/2zrqvr
I did a quick scan and I don't think there's a scene like that. I did a search for the word "boy" and nothing comes up. That doesn't mean it isn't in there, I just don't have time to look.
I think it's a Hollywood trope rather than a stolen scene, per se. It's a shorthand way of saying "look at how these savages do things, so primitive and backward from us" when in fact it's really an example of the opposite. (Not that I'm saying prostituting children is an advanced way of thinking, mind you.)
Clearly I haven't spoken to Chamberlain but my guess is that's how he was reading the scene -- similarly when his Western self is appalled by the idea of BATHING. Like, OMG, do NOT put water and SOAP on me, I'll catch my death. That's much more played out in the book than in the miniseries.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-08 09:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-08 10:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-08 09:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-08 10:15 pm (UTC)I read Shogun and the Thorn Birds last year, but have yet to see either of the Chamberlain miniseries. Something tells me that's ok...
no subject
Date: 2008-01-08 10:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-08 10:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-09 01:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-09 02:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-09 02:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-09 03:05 pm (UTC)