don't get me started ... uh oh, too late
Nov. 23rd, 2009 10:52 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Toys for Tots's heart is in the right place, but I realized today that according to its policy it does not accept any gifts that are handmade or handcrafted.
I think this is bad policy for a number of reasons:
1. It promotes commercialism by privileging disposable, manufactured crap over quality, handmade items.
2. It inculcates commercial values onto children by refusing to distribute anything other than factory sealed, brand-new merchandise.
3. It discourages creativity, both for the sender and for the child.
4. It reinforces the conviction that the holidays are about shopping, not about giving.
Shall I go on?
I think this is bad policy for a number of reasons:
1. It promotes commercialism by privileging disposable, manufactured crap over quality, handmade items.
2. It inculcates commercial values onto children by refusing to distribute anything other than factory sealed, brand-new merchandise.
3. It discourages creativity, both for the sender and for the child.
4. It reinforces the conviction that the holidays are about shopping, not about giving.
Shall I go on?
Disagree: a parable
Date: 2009-11-23 04:46 pm (UTC)My argument is always that yes, [Dog] is perfectly lovely. [Dog] won't bother anyone...and yet, many dogs are untrained and obnoxious, and many dog owners do not even attempt to control their dogs or make them pleasant to be around. Hence, a policy. A policy that sadly excludes a lovely dog, but a policy that is basically pretty sound.
I have seen the handcrafted things you make, and they are lovely. I have seen handcrafted items made by others, and they are shoddy, ugly, etc. Like, the kind of thing that would make a child weep for disappointment if found in a stocking.
Imagine the number of well-meaning church groups or craft circles or whoever who would righteously get together and craft, well, crap to foist off on the poor kids if Toys for Tots did not have this policy.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-23 05:51 pm (UTC)Commercially available toys have to pass safety standards and n be recalled if someone discovers a problem, so they don't have this problem, KWIM?
Also: recipients of these gifts overall tend to be a less-educated, less-aware demographic of society, and less able to catch these kinds of problems....
Beautiful safe homemade gifts are DA BOMB but unfortunately there is a lot of room for bad judgement and if Toys for Tots got sued because they gave a kid a handmade gift and the kid choked on a glued-on button eyeball, Toys for Tots would be out of business permanently.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-23 05:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-01 10:45 pm (UTC)Plus needy kids have such low self-esteem that they're looking for a lift with a shiny new toy to say that they are just as deserving as any other kid. It's kind of hard to say that to yourself when your toy is beat-up, your clothes are shabby, out of date from Goodwill. They know.
(Which is not to say your sock monkeys are awful. They are wonderful!! Have you talked to Daisyfields about stuffed bears? I know Lorraine at A Good Yarn had done some donations for them.)
no subject
Date: 2009-11-23 06:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-23 06:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-23 08:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-23 07:26 pm (UTC)I guess it's just not the same as it used to be...
no subject
Date: 2009-11-23 08:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-23 08:51 pm (UTC)As for the repairs, etc. I'm guessing one of the other issues is toys used to be a lot simpler and therefore easier to repair. Not to mention the possible liability issues (blame the lawyers ;).
no subject
Date: 2009-11-23 09:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-01 10:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-25 07:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-25 07:45 pm (UTC)I think the whole hoax was perpetrated by the National Sugar Council.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-01 10:35 pm (UTC)